Driven by excellence, focused on strategies for the longer term.

This is the crux of who we are. It is an articulation of precision in purpose, from the Firm’s beginnings to where we are today. Our collective eye is unerringly trained on tomorrow.

Deep sectoral expertise across services and industries.

Our insistence on strategic advisory exacts an in-depth understanding of and involvement with our clients’ businesses and industries. We engage not just individual businesses, but also contribute to the country’s legal and regulatory frameworks.

Personal commitment supported by experience and grit.

We commit early. We pull together internally for greater support. Every effort is sincere, every individual deeply dedicated to their task, their role, to the Firm.

Our undertakings for long-term impact are an organic extension of our purpose.

They are to employ our deep knowledge of the law beyond the business, the transaction, the deal. To use the opportunities and skills we possess, to reflect on the culture we’re creating. Individually and collectively, these are our efforts to help shape the thinking of our future generations, and arm them with strategies for true, sustainable growth.

Knowledge-sharing is intrinsic to equity and inclusivity.

This is a repository of thought leadership, deep insights and strong viewpoints, legal and other news and events and how they impact the industry and our clients.

Relevance is critical to growth. It necessitates a firm that is dynamic and responsive.

Amplifying intrinsic talent, sharpening skills, expanding knowledge, is vital to leading. It defines every aspect of how our firm functions and transacts. This is how we create new benchmarks and set industry standards.

left arrow Oct 27, 2026

Bombay HC Holds that When Ad-Interim / Interim Relief is Granted, Suit Would be Exempt from Pre-Institution Mediation

The Bombay High Court (‘Bombay HC’) in Guiness Securities Ltd. v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.[1] held that once ad-interim / interim relief is granted by a Court, it is to be necessarily presumed that such relief is predicated on the urgency exhibited by the plaintiff and therefore, the plaint cannot be rejected for non-compliance with the requirement of pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Bombay HC further held that the Court cannot, while deciding an application for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, re-examine the findings in the Order granting the ad-interim / interim relief.

[1] Guiness Securities Ltd. v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. & Ors., IAL-34845 of 2024 in Comm. Suit No. 64 of 2024, Bombay High Court (decided on August 21, 2026).

TAGS

SHARE

Subscribe

DISCLAIMER

These are the views and opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Firm. This article is intended for general information only and does not constitute legal or other advice and you acknowledge that there is no relationship (implied, legal or fiduciary) between you and the author/AZB. AZB does not claim that the article's content or information is accurate, correct or complete, and disclaims all liability for any loss or damage caused through error or omission.

RELATED READING

Inter Alia

SEBI Enables Sharing of KYC Information by KRAs with Entities Regulated by IFSCA
Oct 27, 2026 | Capital Markets Financial Services Regulatory & Securities
Inter Alia

Delhi HC’s Interim Order on ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. OpenAI OPCO LLC
Oct 27, 2026 | Dispute Resolution Intellectual Property Technology Media and Telecommunication
Inter Alia

Draft Directions Restricting Revolving Credit Products by NBFCs
Oct 27, 2026 | Banking & Finance Financial Services